奇怪的是，后面渐渐有人和她一样跑动起来，拼命往前冲。这下没人笑了，众人都犹犹豫豫的加快脚步直到加入飞奔的行列，五花八门的挎包砸在五花八门的屁股上，踢踢他他的声音不绝于耳。我终于回过神来，这是红线要进站了吧。可是离着这么远，他们怎么会知道的？或者说，那第一个奔跑起来的女人怎么知道的？我走这条线走了半年多，怎么一点线索都察觉不到？ 我疑惑了好一阵，才发现在我脑袋忙着疑惑的时候，两条腿也没闲着，早已经开始由二四拍换成了六八拍，我的书包也搭拉在屁股上啪啪作响。

结果是令我满意的，并没有火车进站，这说明我的观察能力并不比别人弱，这个清晨的意外仅仅是神经质的失控在一个互补认识的松散群体里的突然爆发而已。这个世界流行的东西实在太多了，我们不被卷进这个，就被卷进那个中去。

我只好去换手机，结果换给我一个ericsson,是我不能一手把握的砖头。

问题是，我的号码们又丢失了。

这手机不是他妈的派来玩我的吧？

晚上看了一部电影，是国内拍的，叫什么反恐特遣队。警察盘问火车上一个剧组演员，怎么皮包里会有手榴弹。她天真的拿起一个说，这是假的，用来做道具的，只会冒烟不爆炸，不信我拉一个你们看。

老刑警队长冲着躺病床上戴着呼吸机的被警察击中的嫌犯大声喊：“你听得见吗？？？你的同伙带没带炸药上火车？？？”

理你都是傻的。

http://model.chinajewelry.net/dos/dosbbs/cmdmain.asp

--"hello?"

--"this is not a telemarketing call. Please listen carefully as it contains very important information regarding ur financial status---

"sorry ur homework is past due

 sorry ur bills r past due

 sorry ur greeting is past due

 sorry ur facial care is past due

 sorry ur laments r past due

 sorry ur decision is past due

 sorry ur promise is past due

 sorry ur negligence is past due

 sorry ur recovering is past due

 sorry all u have not yet done is past due"

--"u may hang up now."

Would this be the most significant difference between real life and films? Anyway music is good, but not always, and especially not always so in movies, and especially not always so in American movies. Can they not just cut the crappy symphonic stuff reminding us that "we r shooting from a damn helicopter" ?

Stan Getz & Joao Gilberto

Fly me to the moon
Let me play among the stars
Let me see what spring is like
On Jupiter and Mars
In other words:
Hold my hand
In other words:
Darling kiss me
Fill my heart with song
Let me sing forever more
You are all I long for
All I worship and adore
In other words:
Please be true
In other words:
I love you.
 
带我飞去月球
让我在群星间嬉戏
让我去看看木星和火星
的春天会是怎样
 
换句话说
紧握我手
换句话说
亲爱的，吻我
 
让歌声盛满我的心房
让我不停唱下去
你是我渴求的一切
是我全部的崇拜和爱慕
 
换句话说
请千万真切
换句话说
我爱你

SAN FRANCISCO, California (CNN) -- The city of San Francisco Thursday filed a lawsuit against the state of California, challenging the state law that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman only, the city attorney's office said.

"Same-sex couples who want the opportunity to sanctify their relationships and solemnize their relationships are entitled to the same protections under the law as opposite-sex couples," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera.

The action comes one week after newly elected Mayor Gavin Newsom ordered the county clerk to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Nearly 3,000 couples have taken advantage of it, despite the filing of two lawsuits against the practice.

Herrera said the grounds of the state constitutional challenge are "equal protection and due process."

"What we're asking for in our declaratory relief action ... is simply that the three sections of the California Family Code, which exclude same-sex marriage, be declared unconstitutional," Herrera said.

When asked if the state had rejected the same-sex marriage licenses as invalid, Herrera said he had not heard of any instances of that.

"We've said all along we think that they're legal," he responded.

The attorney said he hopes to consolidate the cases against same-sex marriage pending against the city with the city's lawsuit against the state. A hearing on that matter is scheduled for Friday at 11 a.m. PT (2 p.m. ET).

"I would anticipate that this case is going to have a long life," Herrera replied when asked about the national ramifications of the city's move.

One of the suits against the city was to resume in San Francisco County Superior Court at 2 p.m. PT (5 p.m. ET) Friday. Judge Ronald Quidachay had continued the case from Tuesday. That lawsuit was filed by the Campaign for California Families and the Alliance Defense Fund, which contend the city's issuing of same-sex marriage licenses violates current state law. They asked the judge to stop the practice immediately.

A separate suit, filed by the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund, was continued until March 29 to allow city attorneys time to prepare to show cause as to why Newsom's action is allowable.

Across the street from the Superior Court is City Hall, where lines of people snaked out the front door and down the steps as gays and lesbians from inside and outside the state hurried to get their relationships validated in the eyes of the law.

Newsom has said that marriage between same-sex couples is "inevitable" and that anything less is "fundamentally wrong."

Almost two-thirds of Americans do not think same-sex marriages should be recognized as legally valid, according to a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll.

But the 1,006 people polled on Monday and Tuesday were almost split over whether individual states or the federal government should determine laws regarding marriages between gays or lesbians.

President Bush Wednesday repeated his belief that marriage should be restricted to heterosexual couples, adding that he was "troubled" by what was happening in San Francisco.

The president said the definition of marriage should be made by the people -- not by "activist judges." (Full story)

Robert Tyler, of the Alliance Defense Fund said the law is on his side.

"What we're doing is right, we are on the right side of the law," he said. "The mayor is on the wrong side of the law."

Dan Johnson, who this week married his partner of 11 years, Bill Hinson, said he doesn't want to give up his marriage license.

"Not without a fight. It was a wonderful feeling to get married," he said. "I don't want it taken away now."

Supporters of same-sex marriage say denying gay and lesbian couples marriage licenses denies them basic rights.

"We're talking about state inheritance, we're talking about state property issues, we're talking about children's issues, we're talking about power of attorney," Ralph Neas, president of the group People for the American Way, said.

"It's an equal protection issue. It's a fundamental civil rights issue," he added.

Critics of same-sex unions say those rights can be afforded through other means, and homosexual couples don't need a marriage certificate to validate them.

Genevieve Wood, vice president of the Communications Family Research Council, said that redefining marriage might be a slippery slope.

"If we're going to get into redefining marriage, why would we stop at just allowing homosexual marriage?" she asked.

"There are people out there ... who want to engage in polygamy, they think that's a good family structure. There are others who think that group marriages are a family structure," Wood added.

CNN correspondent David Mattingly contributed to this report